Due Process. Presumption of Innocence. Constitutional Accountability.
Deep-dive legal analysis of criminal trials. No cheerleading for prosecution or defense. Just the truth about how the system works, and doesn't.
10 days to arraignment. The family wants no execution. And a man who killed his own mother has something to say about what comes next for Rob Reiner's son.
Read More →A nurse sits in an Alabama jail on a murder charge. No video. No confession. Just one witness who says she saw a push. What happens when a single eyewitness account becomes the entire case?
Read More →Detective Brian Bernard walked the jury through how investigators traced Tara King and Uriah Urick from Baycliff to Laredo. Walmart surveillance, vehicle tracking, and a storage unit rented the day of the arrests.
Read More →Tiffany Griffith walked out of jail after prosecutors reduced her charge from felony to misdemeanor. Her husband testified the alleged victim was bullying their autistic son. And it turns out she's a former school resource officer who once taught kids about bullying.
Read More →Terry Olinger never saw Tammy hit Tara. Not once. Katherine Goolsby saw Tara and Uriah the night of the murder, asking for rides and acting strange. And Detective Bernard found Tammy's body, covered with blankets piled unnaturally around her head.
Read More →California splits insanity cases into two phases. First, the jury decides guilt. Then, if convicted, they decide sanity. For Nick Reiner, that means Alan Jackson gets two shots to save his client's life.
Read More →A Florida mom held a six-year-old underwater until he bled. Her defense? The boy had dunked her son first. The "mama bear" defense has limits. Here's where they are.
Read More →A detective described a teenager's bedroom full of urine bottles and a makeshift bed under a desk. She called it "disgusting." But when the defense asked if she investigated the abuse claim, she said no.
Read More →The verdict broke records. But we never finished the coverage. Now we're releasing 25 videos walking through the full trial. Starting with Rio, the college student who unknowingly drove two murder suspects from the crime scene.
Read More →We covered the capital murder trial in November but never finished the podcast segments. Time to go back and complete what we started.
Read More →Premium legal analysis that teaches you to think like a lawyer and watch the system like a hawk.
Start Here
New Case
Former Michigan football coach charged with assault. A national championship program. A domestic violence arrest. Everything you need to know.
Start Here
The disappearance of Ana Walshe, the investigation, and everything leading to trial.
Opening
Both sides lay out their case. The prosecution promises evidence. The defense promises doubt.
Day 2
Investigators reveal where they looked and what they found.
Day 3
Physical evidence emerges that puts the investigation into sharp focus.
Day 4
The most anticipated witness of the trial delivers testimony that changes everything.
Day 5
The prosecution connects dots between luxury and horror.
Day 6
More witnesses, more evidence, and more questions for the jury to consider.
Day 7
The prosecution's case moves forward as more pieces fall into place.
Day 8
The jury sees more evidence as the prosecution's case takes shape.
Day 9
Key witnesses take the stand as the prosecution builds toward its conclusion.
Day 10
The prosecution presses forward as the jury weighs the mounting evidence.
Latest
Day 11
Guilty of first-degree murder. Life without parole. The defense gamble failed.
Start Here
Everything you need to know before watching the trial. The people, the charges, and what's at stake.
Day 1
Romeo Angeles was eighteen months old. Trinity Poague was a scholarship recipient. Now one is dead and the other faces life.
Day 2
New witnesses take the stand as contradictions emerge in the narrative.
Day 3
Expert witnesses break down the medical findings as the prosecution builds its case.
Day 4
Questions mount about how this investigation was conducted. What the jury saw raises serious concerns.
Start Here
A state trooper driving 91 mph killed two teenage girls. Ten years later, the families finally got their day in court.
Day 1
Dylan Wall was 18 when the crash shattered his skull. Ten years later, he still can't remember a thing. But the prosecution doesn't need his memory.
Day 2
The math is in: At 55 mph, Scott stops in time. At 82, two girls die. The prosecution's speed evidence lands, while the defense plants seeds about alcohol in the other car.
Day 3
The prosecution rests. The defense begins. And an accident reconstructionist spends hours arguing that two dead teenagers are responsible for their own deaths.
Day 4
A.J. Scott tells his story to the jury. Cross-examination reveals he stopped someone for 96 mph just two hours before the crash. Both sides rest.
Latest
Day 5 + Verdict
Ten years of waiting ends with a split verdict. Guilty on five counts, not guilty on one. The jury convicts Scott for one death but acquits on the other.
Start Here
A 20-year-old mother faces murder charges after her 1-year-old died in a hot car. The jury must decide: tragic mistake or conscious disregard for life?
Day 1
Two teenagers accused of killing a grandmother for money. The prosecution's opening paints a picture of premeditation and greed.
Latest
Day 2
A retired firefighter testifies about discovering the body. The prosecution builds its case through forensic evidence and financial trails.
Complete video coverage of every trial day. Live broadcasts, commercial-free editions, and podcast-style analysis.
MI v. Sherrone Moore
MA v. Brian Walshe
GA v. Trinity Poague
GA v. A.J. Scott
CA v. Maya Hernandez
One Decision Changes Everything
A CPA's life is destroyed after a tragic accident. But was the process that convicted him actually just?
Dave Schrader had everything. A successful practice. A family who loved him. Then came the party, the dark country road, and the split-second choice that would cost a sixteen-year-old boy his life. What follows isn't just a story about guilt or punishment. It's a story about what happens when a man enters a system designed to produce outcomes, not fairness.
Justice isn't an outcome. Justice is a process.
Get the Book on AmazonIndependent legal coverage takes time, resources, and relentless effort. Here's how you can help continue the mission Steven M. Askin started.
One-time contributions go directly to supporting trial coverage, research, and keeping this operation running. No subscription needed.
Support on Ko-fiQuick and direct. Send support instantly through Cash App. Every dollar goes toward continuing the mission.
$JusticeisaprocessYouTube members get access to the live Toolkit folder with downloadable breakdowns, case documents, live stream perks, and badges.
Join on YouTubeOfficial merchandise. T-shirts, hoodies, mugs, and more. Every purchase supports independent legal coverage.
Shop Merchandise
I'm not a lawyer. I'm trained differently.
At age 12, I watched my father get indicted. I sat in the courtroom audience. I reviewed his files. I got an education no law school provides. I became a criminal defendant's family member facing the possibility of losing everything.
My father, Steven M. Askin, was a renowned West Virginia criminal defense attorney for 23 years. He was prosecuted twice by the system he challenged. First for protecting attorney-client privilege. Later for teaching people their constitutional rights from a coffee shop.
"The system only works if we force it to work. If we watch. If we question. If we refuse to let them operate in darkness."
Justice Is A Process continues his legacy. We cover trials not to entertain, but to educate. To teach people how the system really works. To be the watchdog the justice system needs.
Have feedback? Know of a case we should cover? Want to share a tip or just say hello? Reach out directly.
Click to open your email app, or copy the address above
1948 — 2024
Steven M. Askin was a West Virginia criminal defense attorney for 23 years. He wasn't just a lawyer. He was a fighter who believed that constitutional rights belong to everyone, not just those who can afford them.
In 1994, the federal government came for him. He refused to violate attorney-client privilege, even when a judge ordered him to testify. He went to prison for seven months. The West Virginia Supreme Court disbarred him in 1998.
But he didn't stop. He rebuilt. He became a street lawyer, working from coffee shops in Martinsburg, helping people the system abandoned. People who couldn't afford lawyers. People fighting Pro Se against a machine designed to crush them. He taught them the law. He showed them how to stand up for their rights. He did it for free, or for whatever they could afford.
In 2009, on the morning he was supposed to get his law license back, he was indicted on 11 counts of unauthorized practice of law. For helping people from a coffee shop. For teaching them their constitutional rights. The prosecutor said she feared he would "disrupt the legal system."
She was right to be afraid. His mission lives on.
"The system only works if we force it to work. If we watch. If we question. If we refuse to let them operate in darkness."
Follow his story in the documentary podcast series
Watch Episode 1: The Story BeginsNew episodes on the Justice Is A Process YouTube channel
