On March 4, 2022, at roughly 3 a.m., Kouri Richins called 911 from her home in Francis, Utah. Her husband Eric was cold to the touch. Unresponsive. She told the dispatcher she'd gone to sleep in a child's bedroom earlier that evening because one of their three sons was having a night terror. When she came back to the master bedroom hours later, Eric was at the foot of the bed. Gone.
He was 39 years old.
First responders arrived about twenty minutes later. There was nothing they could do. Eric Richins, a masonry business owner, a youth sports coach, a father of three boys under ten, was dead. No obvious cause. No signs of trauma. Just a healthy man who went to bed and never woke up.
Toxicology would later reveal that Eric had five times the lethal dose of fentanyl in his system.
That alone would make this case worth watching. But what happened next is what turned a Summit County death investigation into one of the most followed criminal cases in the country.
One year after Eric died, his wife Kouri published a children's book called "Are You With Me?" She wrote it with her three sons. The book features a father with angel wings watching over his young boy. It was marketed as a tool to help children process the grief of losing a parent. She went on local television to promote it. She did interviews. She was praised.
Four weeks after the book came out, Kouri Richins was arrested and charged with her husband's murder.
The allegation: she poisoned him with fentanyl, slipped into a cocktail she made him that night. And prosecutors say it wasn't even her first attempt.
Kouri Richins has pleaded not guilty. She has been sitting in the Summit County Jail without bail since May 2023. Nearly three years. Her defense attorneys say the prosecution's narrative that has dominated headlines bears little resemblance to the truth. They say she is a mother who wants to go home to her children.
Tomorrow, a jury of eight Summit County residents and four alternates will begin hearing this case. Opening statements kick off a five-week trial that will run from February 23 through March 27, 2026.
We're going to be there. Every day.
Not to convict. Not to acquit. To watch. To make sure the system does what it's supposed to do: prove its case beyond a reasonable doubt while protecting the constitutional rights of the accused. That's the job. That's always the job.
This is Justice Is A Process. Let's get into it.
Before this became a murder case, before the book, before the headlines, Eric Richins was a person. And that's where we start.
Born May 13, 1982, to Linda and Gene Richins, Eric grew up on a cattle ranch. Mending fences. Hauling hay. He was the oldest of three, with two younger sisters. A blue-eyed kid from Bountiful, Utah, who was naturally athletic and played basketball, baseball, and soccer growing up. He attended Woods Cross High School before earning his bachelor's degree from the University of Utah in 2011.
Two years before graduating, Eric started a masonry business called C&E Stone Masonry with his close friend and business partner Cody Wright. The "C" and "E" stood for their first initials. The company specialized in intricate outdoor stonework, pavers, and tile in high-end homes around the Park City area. By all accounts, the business was successful.
On June 15, 2013, Eric married Kouri Darden in the backyard of their Kamas home. They had three sons together, all under ten years old at the time of Eric's death.
The people who knew Eric describe him the same way. A proud dad. A generous man. The kind of person who coached his boys' sports teams and donated whatever stipend he received right back. Greg Skordas, the attorney who serves as spokesperson for Eric's family, called him a philanthropist. His friend Linda King, who helped introduce Eric and Kouri years earlier, said what she remembers most is his laugh. She said it was the best laugh in town.
But behind the family photos and the coaching schedules, something was wrong.
According to court documents, Eric discovered in 2020 that Kouri had taken at least $100,000 from his bank accounts, spent more than $30,000 on his credit cards without his knowledge, and obtained a $250,000 home equity line of credit on their Kamas home without telling him. Prosecutors allege she was also diverting funds meant for federal and state quarterly tax payments, totaling at least $134,346.
Eric confronted her. She agreed to pay him back, according to the filing. But Eric wasn't satisfied with a promise. In October 2020, he met with both a divorce attorney and an estate planning lawyer. He told the estate planner he wanted to protect himself from what he described as recently discovered and ongoing financial abuse.
The following month, Eric made moves. He removed Kouri as the beneficiary of his $500,000 life insurance policy. He transferred his home and his interest in C&E Stone Masonry to a trust managed by his sister, Katie Richins-Benson. He changed his will.
He did all of this without telling Kouri.
According to family members, Eric stayed in the marriage despite everything. When asked why, Skordas gave a simple answer: three boys. All under ten. Eric lived for them. He coached them. He would have done anything to keep his family together.
But he also told his family something chilling, according to a search warrant obtained from the Summit County Sheriff's Office. Eric warned them: if anything ever happens to me, she's to blame.
Prosecutors allege the story of Eric Richins' death doesn't begin on March 4, 2022. It begins months earlier, with a trail of insurance policies, financial desperation, and an affair.
According to charging documents, Kouri Richins had opened numerous life insurance policies on her husband without his knowledge over the course of their marriage. Prosecutors say the combined benefits totaled nearly $2 million. Eric's autopsy would later reveal medications prescribed to Kouri in his system, in addition to the fentanyl.
Kouri was also allegedly involved with another man. Prosecutors describe him as her "paramour." The day after what the state calls her first attempt on Eric's life, Kouri allegedly texted this man: "If he could just go away... life would be so perfect."
That first attempt, according to the state, happened on Valentine's Day 2022.
Prosecutors say that on February 11, 2022, a woman who cleaned houses for the Richins family, Carmen Lauber, purchased more than 15 pills she believed to contain fentanyl from a drug dealer. She then gave those pills to Kouri Richins, according to charging documents.
Three days later, on Valentine's Day, Kouri left Eric a sandwich and a note before heading out to meet her alleged lover. Later that day, Eric texted his wife that he wasn't feeling well and might need to go to the hospital.
What happened next is alarming. According to charging documents, Eric told two friends he felt like he was going to die after eating the sandwich. He broke out in severe hives. He couldn't breathe. He grabbed his son's EpiPen, injected himself, then chugged Benadryl before passing out for several hours.
When he woke up, Eric called a friend. According to written testimony from that friend, Eric said: "I think my wife tried to poison me."
Prosecutors allege that roughly two weeks later, on February 26, Kouri contacted her housekeeper again. The state says she told Lauber that the pills she'd provided weren't strong enough. She allegedly asked for something stronger. Lauber says she obtained more pills and gave them to Richins.
A new life insurance policy on Eric had gone into effect on February 4, 2022. Just ten days before the Valentine's Day incident.
According to Kouri's account to Summit County deputies, she and Eric were celebrating that evening. She had closed on a house for her real estate business, and she made him a Moscow Mule to mark the occasion. He drank it in their bedroom.
Kouri told deputies she went to sleep in one of her children's bedrooms around 9:30 p.m. because the child was having a night terror. She said she left her phone charging in the master bedroom.
Around 3 a.m., she returned. Eric was at the foot of the bed. Cold. Unresponsive.
Prosecutors allege Kouri waited 13 minutes before calling 911.
First responders arrived roughly 20 minutes after the call. Eric Richins was pronounced dead.
The medical examiner determined Eric was in good health. He didn't use medications containing fentanyl. There was nothing to suggest he used illicit drugs recreationally. Friends and family confirmed the same. The autopsy concluded he likely consumed the fentanyl orally. Five times the lethal dose.
On April 13, 2022, police informed Kouri that her husband had died of a fentanyl overdose.
Three days later, according to charging documents, Kouri was using her cellphone to search for: "what happens to deleted messages," "how do police and forensic analysts recover deleted data from phones," and "signs of being under federal investigation." She also read an article titled "cause of death usually does not impact life insurance payment."
On March 9, 2022, five days after Eric's death, prosecutors claim Kouri obtained fentanyl a third time from her housekeeper's dealer.
On June 9, 2022, Kouri was charged with assault, a class B misdemeanor, after an altercation with Eric's sister, Amy Richins. The dispute was over the family home. A lawyer had informed Kouri that Eric had placed the home into a trust and that one of his sisters was the trustee. According to charging documents, Kouri assaulted Amy after learning this.
Three weeks after Eric's death, Kouri filed a lawsuit against Eric's trust, seeking control of the money and assets his estate held.
If this case goes where prosecutors want to take it, the jury is going to hear a lot about money. Because the state's theory isn't just that Kouri Richins killed her husband. It's that she killed him because she needed him dead financially.
Here's what the financial picture looks like according to court filings.
By at least 2016, prosecutors allege Kouri had been stealing from Eric to fund her house-flipping business and cover her growing debts. She took money from his bank accounts. She ran up his credit cards. She diverted his business distributions that were supposed to cover quarterly tax payments. She obtained a home equity line of credit against their home without telling him.
The numbers, according to the probate petition filed by Eric's family: at least $100,000 from bank accounts, over $30,000 on credit cards, $134,346 in diverted tax payments, and a $250,000 HELOC. By the time of Eric's death, prosecutors say Kouri had a negative bank account balance, owed lenders more than $1.8 million, and was being sued by a creditor.
In 2021, prosecutors allege Kouri submitted a falsified bank statement to a financial institution to obtain a loan, using balance details and transaction descriptions from Eric's company.
And then there's the life insurance.
Prosecutors allege Kouri had opened multiple life insurance policies on Eric without his knowledge, with combined benefits totaling nearly $2 million. A handwriting expert, Matt Throckmorton, is expected to testify at trial that signatures on certain insurance and financial documents were not Eric's.
What Kouri apparently didn't know was that Eric had already protected himself. He'd changed his will. He'd created a living trust naming his sister Katie as trustee. He'd removed Kouri as beneficiary on his $500,000 policy. He'd placed his home and his business interest in that trust.
Prosecutors say Kouri mistakenly believed she would inherit Eric's estate under the terms of their prenuptial agreement. She was wrong. And she didn't find that out until after he was dead.
In August 2023, a court ruled that Eric's sister, not Kouri, would receive the $2 million from his business partner's buy/sell agreement for C&E Stone Masonry. Eric's family now controls his estate. Kouri faces a civil lawsuit from the family exceeding $13 million.
The prosecution's argument is straightforward: Kouri was drowning in debt, believed she stood to inherit millions, and needed Eric dead to collect.
The defense says the financial picture is more complicated than prosecutors want the jury to believe. They've pushed back on the narrative that Kouri was in "total financial collapse," saying the prosecution is cherry-picking to build a motive that doesn't hold up under scrutiny.
The jury will decide who's telling the truth.
This is the part that made the case go national.
On March 7, 2023, almost exactly one year after Eric's death, Kouri Richins self-published a children's book titled "Are You With Me?" The book was written with her three sons. It features a father with angel wings watching over his young son. Kouri marketed it as a way to help children work through the grief of losing a parent.
She did media appearances. She went on ABC4's "Good Things Utah" in April 2023 and told viewers her husband "passed away unexpectedly last year." She was featured on KPCW radio in Park City. She promoted the book online. Reviews came in. Some praised the concept. Others criticized it for including the children's real names and photos.
Then, on May 8, 2023, everything changed.
Summit County Sheriff's deputies arrested Kouri Richins outside a Salt Lake City business. She was charged with aggravated murder and three counts of possession of a controlled substance with intent to distribute in the death of her husband.
The book was pulled from Amazon. The media appearances became evidence of something far darker than anyone expected. A woman who'd been on television talking about helping children cope with loss was now sitting in a jail cell, accused of causing that loss.
I'm not the judge here. But I am watching.
The question this case forces is uncomfortable but necessary. Did a grieving widow write a book to help her sons through the worst moment of their lives? Or did a woman who allegedly murdered her husband then profit off his death publicly while investigators closed in?
That's for twelve people in a Summit County courtroom to decide. Our job is to make sure the process gets it right.
Kouri Richins faces five charges in her murder trial. Each one carries serious weight. Let me walk through them in plain English so you understand exactly what the state has to prove.
Utah Code § 76-5-202
What it means: The State alleges Kouri intentionally or knowingly caused Eric's death, and that the killing was committed for financial gain. That "financial gain" element is what elevates this from murder to aggravated murder under Utah law.
What they must prove: That Eric Richins is dead. That Kouri caused his death. That she did so intentionally or knowingly. That the killing was motivated by financial gain.
The penalty: Summit County prosecutors announced in August 2023 that they would not seek the death penalty, a decision made in consultation with Eric's father and two sisters. Without the death penalty, aggravated murder carries a minimum of 25 years to life in prison.
The burden: Entirely on the State. Kouri doesn't have to prove anything. She doesn't have to testify. She doesn't have to explain herself. The State has to prove every element beyond a reasonable doubt.
What it means: This charge relates to the alleged Valentine's Day 2022 poisoning attempt. The State claims Kouri tried to kill Eric with fentanyl approximately three weeks before his death by lacing a sandwich she left for him.
What they must prove: That Kouri took a substantial step toward causing Eric's death on or around February 14, 2022. That she acted intentionally or knowingly.
The penalty: Five years to life in prison.
What it means: Two separate charges alleging Kouri filed fraudulent insurance claims related to Eric's death. Prosecutors say she opened policies on Eric without his knowledge and attempted to collect after his death.
What they must prove: That Kouri knowingly submitted false or fraudulent insurance claims.
The penalty: One to 15 years per count.
What it means: The State alleges Kouri forged documents related to the insurance policies and financial transactions. A handwriting expert is expected to testify that certain signatures purporting to be Eric's were not actually his.
What they must prove: That Kouri created, altered, or used a forged document with the intent to defraud.
The penalty: Up to five years in prison.
In addition to the five charges going to trial, Kouri faces a separate criminal case filed in June 2025 that includes five counts of mortgage fraud, five counts of forgery, seven counts of issuing a bad check, seven counts of money laundering, one count of communications fraud, and one count of engaging in a "pattern of unlawful activity."
That's 26 additional charges. In a separate case. With a separate trial date.
The mortgage fraud charges relate to allegations that Kouri submitted falsified financial documents to lenders. Prosecutors say she used balance details and transaction descriptions from Eric's company accounts to make herself appear financially solvent when she wasn't. The bad check charges suggest a pattern of writing checks she couldn't cover. The money laundering charges allege she moved funds in ways designed to conceal their origin or destination. And the "pattern of unlawful activity" charge is Utah's version of a RICO-style accusation, arguing that these weren't isolated incidents but a coordinated scheme.
These charges were originally bundled with the murder case. In November 2024, Judge Mrazik granted the defense's request to try them separately. That was probably the right call. You don't want a jury deciding whether someone committed murder while simultaneously digesting 26 counts of financial crime. The risk of prejudice is obvious.
But here's the tension. The prosecution's entire motive theory for the murder rests on the financial picture. Kouri was allegedly buried in debt, forging documents, draining accounts, and she believed she stood to inherit millions if Eric died. You can't tell that story without getting into the financial details. So while the financial charges are technically separate, the money is going to be front and center in this murder trial regardless.
Kouri has not yet entered a plea on the financial charges.
I want to be clear about something. Charges are accusations. Every one of them. The financial charges don't prove the murder charge. The murder charge doesn't prove the financial charges. Each stands on its own, and each requires independent proof beyond a reasonable doubt.
That's not a technicality. That's how the system is supposed to work.
Summit County prosecutors, led by County Attorney Margaret Olson and Chief Prosecutor Brad Bloodworth, walk into this trial with over 100 potential witnesses and more than 1,000 exhibits. They've had four years to build this case. The evidence they plan to present tells a story of financial desperation, premeditation, and deception.
Their key evidence includes:
Carmen Lauber, the housekeeper who says she procured fentanyl pills for Kouri on multiple occasions. Lauber told investigators that Kouri asked for the pills starting in early February 2022, then came back saying she needed something stronger after the Valentine's Day incident. Lauber has been granted immunity and is not charged in connection with the case. She is expected to be the prosecution's star witness.
Text messages and digital evidence, including the Google searches Kouri allegedly conducted days after Eric's death about deleted messages, data recovery by forensic analysts, and whether cause of death affects life insurance payouts.
The autopsy results showing five times the lethal dose of fentanyl, orally consumed, in a man with no history of drug use.
Handwriting expert Matt Throckmorton, who is expected to testify that signatures on insurance and financial documents were not Eric's, suggesting forgery in the creation of the life insurance policies.
An orange notebook found during the search of the Richins' home in Francis, Utah. The notebook reportedly contains journal entries from the day before and the day of Eric's death. Judge Mrazik has ruled it may be used at trial if prosecutors meet certain conditions.
Body camera footage from first responders arriving at the Richins home on the night Eric died.
And portions of the "Walk the Dog" letter, a handwritten document found in Kouri's jail cell that prosecutors describe as instructions to her mother and brother about providing false testimony. More on that shortly.
Kouri's defense team, attorneys Wendy Lewis, Kathy Nester, and Alex Ramos, have been vocal about what they see as a prosecution built on narrative rather than evidence. They've signaled several key defense strategies.
The biggest one: the drug dealer recanted.
The man who allegedly sold fentanyl pills to Carmen Lauber, a dealer named Crozier, initially told investigators in 2023 that he sold Lauber fentanyl. But he was in jail and detoxing from drug use when he made that statement. He later signed a sworn affidavit saying he only sold Lauber OxyContin, not fentanyl.
The defense has argued this is devastating for the prosecution. In a motion filed last fall, Richins' lawyers wrote: "If the state cannot place fentanyl in the hands of the defendant, the state has no case." They called the recantation a grenade in the middle of the prosecution's theory.
Prosecutors pushed back, arguing Crozier's later claim isn't credible.
No fentanyl pills were ever found in the Richins home.
The defense has also challenged the Moscow Mule narrative itself. Attorney Wendy Lewis has stated publicly that prosecutors have never actually told the defense what their theory of the murder weapon is. Lewis says the Moscow Mule detail came from an early statement Kouri made to investigators about what she and Eric drank that evening, and the media ran with it. But the prosecution has never confirmed that's how they believe the fentanyl was administered.
On the Google searches, the defense says Kouri looked up fentanyl-related information after being told her husband died of a fentanyl overdose, not before. Lewis has argued there's a significant difference between a woman researching how her husband died versus a woman researching how to kill him.
The defense also challenged the collection of evidence itself, arguing investigators took Kouri's phone without a proper warrant and failed to read her Miranda rights despite knowing she had an attorney.
This needs its own section because it's been one of the most contentious pretrial battles in the case.
In September 2023, prosecutors publicly filed a six-page handwritten letter found during a search of Kouri's jail cell. It was discovered inside an LSAT study book. Scrawled across the top: "Walk The Dog!! But take vague notes so you remember."
Prosecutors say the letter was addressed to Kouri's mother and instructed family members on how to testify. According to the prosecution, it outlines a plan to have Kouri's brother claim that Eric told him he obtained fentanyl and pain pills from Mexico through ranch workers.
The defense told a completely different story. Kouri's attorneys said the letter was part of a 65-page fictional mystery novel she was writing about being in a Mexican prison. In a recorded jail call with her mother, Kouri reportedly said: "Those papers were not a letter to you guys; they were part of my freaking book."
The letter triggered months of litigation. The defense argued it was protected attorney-client communication because it was found in an envelope marked for her then-attorney, Skye Lazaro. Prosecutors called it witness tampering. The defense moved to dismiss the entire case based on the letter being made public, arguing it destroyed Kouri's chance at a fair trial. Judge Mrazik denied the dismissal but partially granted the motion on admissibility. Redacted portions of the letter will be shown to the jury.
Whether jurors see it as witness tampering or fiction writing could matter.
One more detail that surfaced during pretrial proceedings. A search warrant unsealed in May 2024 revealed that Kouri's mother, Lisa Darden, had a romantic partner who also died of what investigators described as a "suspicious overdose" in 2006. Darden was living with the woman at the time and was named as her beneficiary shortly before her death.
Investigators cited Darden's proximity to this earlier suspicious death and her close relationship with Kouri as reasons to seek a search warrant for evidence of a possible conspiracy. Darden has not been charged with any crime. The family spokesperson for Eric's side told reporters he wouldn't be surprised if Kouri had help planning the alleged murder.
Whether any of this comes before the jury remains to be seen. But it's part of the picture surrounding this trial.
This case has been fought tooth and nail for nearly three years before opening statements. The court docket has nearly 1,600 entries. There are at least a dozen terabytes of potential evidence. And the pretrial battles themselves raise serious questions about how the system has handled this case.
Three bail requests. All denied. Two requests to move the trial out of Summit County. Both denied. A motion to dismiss the case entirely. Denied. A motion to disqualify the Summit County Attorney's Office. Denied. An appeal to the Utah Supreme Court on venue. The court declined to hear it.
And layered on top of all of that, a new set of financial charges filed in a separate case in June 2025, adding mortgage fraud, bad checks, money laundering, communications fraud, and more.
Kouri Richins has been in custody for over 1,000 days.
This is where Justice Is A Process lives. Not in the headlines. Not in the drama. In the constitutional questions.
Look, every defendant in this country is entitled to certain protections. It doesn't matter how bad the allegations are. It doesn't matter what the media says. It doesn't matter what your gut tells you. The Constitution applies to everyone or it applies to no one.
My father, Steven M. Askin, spent his career fighting for these principles. He went to prison for refusing to violate attorney-client privilege. He was convicted of unauthorized practice of law for teaching people their rights from a coffee shop. He understood something fundamental: the system only works when we force it to work. When we watch. When we question. When we refuse to let public opinion replace due process.
So here's what I'm watching for in this trial.
Was the evidence properly obtained? The defense has raised serious questions about how investigators collected key evidence. They argue Kouri's phone was taken without a proper warrant. They claim she wasn't Mirandized despite investigators knowing she had an attorney. The prosecution conceded that an orange notebook was illegally seized during a search but argued it would have been "inevitably discovered." A recent internal investigation revealed that at least three witnesses confirmed conversations took place about whether Kouri could be interviewed despite having an attorney, contradicting earlier testimony from the lead detective. That's not a small thing.
During a suppression hearing in January 2025, Detective Eric Maynard and Deputy Jayme Woody both admitted under cross-examination that they never read Kouri her rights. They never told her she could have a lawyer present. They never told her she could remain silent. Both said she wasn't technically under arrest and that she voluntarily handed over her phone. But the defense argued that investigators directed her to retrieve her phone from her vehicle, effectively using her hands to conduct a search they didn't have authorization to perform.
Then it got worse. In late January 2025, prosecutors disclosed that an internal investigation had been launched after Lieutenant Justin Hemmingway, the lead detective's supervisor, shared recollections that contradicted Detective O'Driscoll's sworn testimony. At least three witnesses confirmed that before Kouri was interviewed, there were conversations about whether investigators could proceed knowing she had an attorney. One of those witnesses was an employee of the Summit County Attorney's Office who was advising law enforcement at the time.
The defense called the detective's testimony into question. The prosecution called the defense's motion a "cheap litigation trick." Judge Mrazik hasn't thrown the evidence out. But these are the kinds of cracks that matter at trial, especially if the defense can paint a picture of investigators cutting corners.
Was attorney-client privilege respected? The "Walk the Dog" letter was found in a jail cell in what the defense says was an envelope marked for her attorney. Whether that document was legitimately seized or whether it violated privilege is a question that touches the heart of the Sixth Amendment. My dad would have something to say about that. He went to federal prison for refusing to violate attorney-client privilege. The principle doesn't change just because the accusation is serious. If investigators can rummage through materials marked for defense counsel, the right to an attorney means nothing.
Can she get a fair trial? This case has been in the news for three years. It's been covered by CNN, AP, Court TV, and every outlet in Utah. The defense tried twice to move the trial out of Summit County. Both times denied. The Utah Supreme Court declined to intervene. During jury selection, most potential jurors acknowledged they'd seen or heard something about the case, though many said they didn't know details and hadn't formed strong opinions. Judge Mrazik instructed them not to research, read, watch, or discuss anything about the case. Over 1,400 jury questionnaires were completed. They managed to seat eight jurors and four alternates in just a few days.
Is the burden of proof being maintained? This is the one I watch closest. Motive is not proof. Financial trouble is not proof. An affair is not proof. Suspicious behavior after a death is not proof. Each of those things is a piece of a puzzle. But the State still has to connect them with actual evidence that Kouri Richins put fentanyl into something her husband consumed on the night he died. That's the gap. That's where the case lives or dies. Can they bridge it?
I'm not saying these issues mean the case should be thrown out. I'm saying they matter. They always matter. The system doesn't get to cut corners just because the allegations are serious. In fact, the more serious the allegations, the more important it is that every right is protected.
That's not defending Kouri Richins. That's defending the Constitution.
Five weeks is a long trial. Here's where I'll be focusing.
Carmen Lauber's testimony. She's the star witness. She says she bought fentanyl for Kouri. But her drug dealer says he sold her OxyContin, not fentanyl. No pills were ever recovered from the home. How does the prosecution establish that the pills were fentanyl if the only corroboration comes from a witness who recanted? And how does the defense handle a witness who has immunity and nothing to lose by testifying?
The handwriting evidence. If expert testimony establishes that Eric's signature was forged on insurance documents, that's a direct link between the financial motive and the alleged murder. It ties two narratives together: she was forging documents to get insurance she could only collect if Eric was dead.
The orange notebook. This was illegally obtained by the prosecution's own admission. Judge Mrazik said it could potentially be used if the prosecution meets certain conditions. What's in it? How do they get it in? And does the defense effectively argue it should stay out?
The digital evidence. Google searches, text messages, phone records. The prosecution has a narrative that these tell a story of planning and cover-up. The defense says context changes everything. This battle over interpretation could define the trial.
Eric's prior warnings. Family members say Eric told them his wife was trying to kill him. He allegedly said she tried to poison him in Greece years before his death. According to a search warrant, Eric and Kouri took a trip to Greece and after she gave him a drink, he became violently ill. He called his sister and told her he believed his wife had tried to kill him. That was years before he died. Then came Valentine's Day 2022. Then came March 4, 2022. If the jury hears this pattern of escalating incidents through family testimony, it's powerful. But it's also hearsay filtered through the lens of a family that has been living with these suspicions for years. How does the judge handle it? What gets in? What stays out?
The defense's alternative theory. If Kouri didn't do it, what happened? Eric had five times the lethal dose of fentanyl in his system. The defense has to contend with that number even if they challenge how it got there. Do they present an alternative explanation? Do they argue the fentanyl was self-administered? Do they simply attack the prosecution's evidence and rely on reasonable doubt? The defense doesn't have to present a theory. They don't have to prove anything. But juries are human. They want explanations. How Lewis, Nester, and Ramos handle that reality will matter.
The attorneys themselves. This is a battle between two very different legal approaches. Summit County Attorney Margaret Olson and Chief Prosecutor Brad Bloodworth have been building this case for four years. They've been aggressive. They publicly filed the Walk the Dog letter. They've fought every defense motion hard. The defense has accused them of personal attacks and ethical violations. On the other side, Wendy Lewis, Kathy Nester, and Alex Ramos stepped in after Kouri's original attorney withdrew. They're public defenders handling what might be Summit County's biggest case ever. They've filed dozens of motions. They've challenged evidence, testimony, venue, and procedure. The pretrial relationship between these teams has been combative, to put it mildly. That energy will carry into the courtroom.
Starting February 23, 2026, we'll be covering this trial every day it's in session. Monday through Thursday, for five weeks, through March 27.
You'll get:
LIVE BROADCASTS as testimony happens
NO BREAKS EDITIONS for uninterrupted viewing
JUSTICE BREAKDOWNS with deep analysis after each day
TESTIMONY SEGMENTS so you can hear every word
This isn't about speculation. It's about watching the system work. Or watching it fail. Either way, we're here.
The defendant is presumed innocent until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. That's not a technicality. That's the foundation of everything we do here.
Let's watch together.
Subscribe to Justice Is A Process on YouTube for live trial coverage, No Breaks editions, and breaking news as it happens.
🔴 Subscribe on YouTube86,000+ subscribers watching the system with us
Discussion