COMMENTARY
March 1, 2026

Why Is Colin Gray the Only One Charged?

A school resource officer's testimony raises a question nobody in the courtroom wants to answer

8:56 a.m. That's when the email went out.

A teacher at Apalachee High School flagged a student of concern to a school counselor. Something wasn't right. The student had left class, supposedly heading to counseling, and never showed up. An email was sent. People were notified. The system was activated.

The shooting started around 10:30.

Ninety minutes. An hour and a half. That's how long the school had some level of awareness that something was off before four people were killed and nine more were wounded inside that building.

Today, Sergeant Donovan Boyd of the Barrow County Sheriff's Office took the stand in the trial of Colin Gray. Boyd supervises school resource officers across half the county. He wasn't even assigned to Apalachee that day. He was there dropping off a Bible for a student in his police explorers program and checking in on the two SROs assigned to the school.

When he found Deputy King in the atrium, King briefed him. They were looking for a kid. A student who had left a classroom and hadn't made it where he was going. That's it. That was the intelligence.

No description of the student. No name. No indication of any threat. No weapons. Just a missing teenager in a high school of nearly 2,000 kids.

Boyd was clear on the stand: with the information they had, a hard lockdown was not warranted. And I believe him. He walked the jury through the reasoning. A hard lockdown means every door locked, every student sealed inside their classroom, lights out, deep corners. If you do that when an armed individual is already in a classroom, you've just locked the threat inside with the victims. If students are in transition between classes, you've created chaos. Without a reason to believe this missing student posed a physical threat, you don't pull that trigger.

I'm not questioning the SRO's judgment. I'm questioning something bigger.

The 90-Minute Question

Here's what we know from testimony. At 8:56 a.m., a teacher emailed a counselor about a student of concern. By the time Boyd arrived around 9:45 to 9:50 and spoke with Deputy King, the school still hadn't located the student. They had no description. They didn't know what he looked like. They were checking bathrooms and hallways, hoping to run into him.

The shooting happened around 10:30.

That's roughly 90 minutes where the school system knew something was wrong and could not find one student inside one building.

Now, I'm not here to say the school should have known a shooting was coming. Boyd testified clearly that there was no intelligence suggesting this student had a weapon or intended to harm anyone. Fair enough. But the system that was designed to protect those kids, the system that was physically present inside that building with trained law enforcement, couldn't locate one teenager for an hour and a half.

And Colin Gray is the only person facing criminal charges.

Colin Gray wasn't at Apalachee High School that morning. He was at work. He didn't receive the 8:56 email. He wasn't part of the search. He had no way to intervene in what was happening inside that building. The people who were there, who had the information, who had the training, who had the authority to act, could not prevent what happened. But it's the father sitting at the defense table.

The defense landed this point cleanly on cross-examination. Boyd confirmed he didn't know how long people had been searching before he arrived. He confirmed he had no description of the student. He confirmed that if the email went out at 8:56 and the shooting happened around 10:30, the math gives you about 90 minutes.

That number is going to follow this jury into deliberations.

The Accountability Double Standard

The prosecution's theory against Colin Gray is built on the concept of "consciously disregarding" a "substantial and unjustifiable risk." They say he knew his son was troubled. They say he gave him access to a firearm. They say he received sufficient warning that Colt was a danger to others. And they say his failure to act makes him criminally responsible for what happened.

Fine. That's their theory. The jury will decide if they prove it.

But if we're going to use that standard, if "consciously disregarding" known risks is the threshold for criminal liability, then what about the school?

A teacher recognized something was wrong at 8:56 a.m. and reported it. That email activated a chain of people. Counselors. Administrators. School resource officers. Trained law enforcement with universal keys, radios, and the authority to detain. They had 90 minutes, physical proximity, and institutional authority.

They couldn't find him.

I'm not saying every administrator should be charged with murder. That's not my point. My point is this: the prosecution is asking 12 jurors to hold a father criminally responsible for failing to prevent something that the school, with all of its resources and its 90 minutes of warning, also failed to prevent. If the standard is "you knew something was wrong and didn't stop it," that standard doesn't apply to just one person in this story.

What Boyd's Testimony Actually Proved

The prosecution called Boyd to show the jury the heroism of the response. And it was heroic. Two officers sprinting toward gunfire through a smoke-filled hallway where they couldn't see. Boyd mistaking a victim on the floor for a duffel bag because the dust from the drop ceiling was so thick. The apprehension. Pulling loaded AR-15 magazines out of a teenager's pockets. Two officers holding an entire hallway alone, not knowing if there were more shooters, while trying to maintain custody of the one they'd caught.

That testimony was powerful. It should be.

But the defense turned it into something else. By the time cross-examination was done, that same sergeant had confirmed the one fact that undermines the prosecution's entire framing: the system that was present, trained, informed, and equipped had 90 minutes and still couldn't stop it.

If they couldn't, with all of that, how was Colin Gray supposed to from miles away?

What This Means for the Case

Colin Gray has not been found guilty of anything. He's presumed innocent. These are my observations from watching today's testimony, not a verdict.

But I'll say this. If I'm a juror, that 90-minute number sticks. It's concrete. It's easy to understand. And it raises a question the prosecution hasn't answered yet: why is the father the only one sitting at the defense table when the system that was physically there failed too?

The prosecution still has to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that Colin Gray consciously disregarded a substantial and unjustifiable risk. That's a high bar. It should be. And every time the defense can point to another system, another institution, another set of people who also had warning and also failed to act, that bar gets harder to clear.

My father spent his career fighting for the principle that the system has to prove its case. Not with emotion. Not with horror at what happened. With evidence. With proof that this defendant did what they say he did, knew what they say he knew, and disregarded what they say he disregarded.

Four people are dead. Two students and two teachers. Nothing changes that. Nothing makes that okay. The families of Mason Schermerhorn, Christian Angulo, Richard Aspinwall, and Cristina Irimie deserve answers and accountability.

But accountability has to be honest. It has to be complete. And right now, it's looking selective.

▶ WATCH THE TESTIMONY School Resource Officer Reveals Apalachee Had 90 Minutes of Warning Before Shooting

Watch the system. Question everything.

— Justice

Want More?

Subscribe to Justice Is A Process on YouTube for live trial coverage, No Breaks editions, and breaking news as it happens.

🔴 Subscribe on YouTube

86,000+ subscribers watching the system with us

Join the Discussion